#Lonzo ball nba 2k18 upgrade#

Below were the rookie ratings from 2K12 to current. Why would numbers increase because its now? I don't think hype should be a valid rationale re: s about grading guys based on their skills, in comparison to past drafts and the players in the league. They shrank the ratings and gave us much better accuracy from 2K12-current. Ratings were running out of control pre-2K12 which is why I didn't mention it.I remember Josh Smith being an 89-which I think we all agree is laughable now. Also as I pointed out, Wall was rated higher than both of these guys. It's the standard, and with the game improving and players coming in as hyped as they do now, it only makes sense that we see that number increase. Those ratings for the highest rookie in each game average out to 78. One of the reasons I can never use the great created rosters made by the community is because CAP players just don't look right, despite the tremendous effort put forth by the creators.ĢK14 - Anthony Bennett was a 76! and he's arguably the worst #1 pick ever.ĢK15 - Jabari Parker was rated 78 (Wiggins 77) And if you are trying to create a person, such as a missing player or legend, with the face scanning app good luck.

The face scanning app helps but even then they don't give us enough options to take our players to the next level. It doesn't make sense that this game has modes centered around created players but the tools given are lack luster. That mode is long do for an improvement and overhaul. On another note I agree with people about CAPs. If people have expectations of perfection good luck. Players aren't perfect but no sports game to this point has had perfect visuals and player accuracy. The 2k18 screenshots compared to 2k17 are night and day better. As graphics improve more and more people will point out smaller inconsistencies in details.įor me I'm just happy to see that things are still improving. I had the same mindset last year when screenshots first came out and people were pointing out various flaws but it's inevitable. Man how did some of you guys survive during the PS1 era? Complaining about necks, eyes, and shots not being completely perfect lol. I just can't envision any scenario where you look at the production of Fultz and Ball and decide those two players are equivalent.īut sure, I agree the visuals are outstanding. I get the hype but ratings are supposed to be based in truth/facts/metrics. There are serious doubts to his game translating and he was NEVER in the conversation for the #1 pick.especially after workouts-many people think he drops to SAC if the Lakers didn't pick him at #2. I've got a problem with Fultz' 80 so I definitely have an issue with Ball's 80. We have to be careful NOT to be prisoners of the moment. They better not let me down.Īctually they were consistently in the 74-76 range, Ben Simmons was the first 79. Our CAPs already look bad next too the garbage models in 2K17, we'll stand out like Roger Rabbit cartoons next to this level of realism in 2K18.

#Lonzo ball nba 2k18 upgrade#

The MyLeague news and these screenshots made me preorder this game, but honestly if they don't upgrade the CAPs, I'm gonna cancel it and wait for a sale. This is crazy but it's a double edged sword. People want to use the two most hyped rookies in recent history and it makes sense due to the rivalry that they be similarly rated.īut back to the picture. I believe Nick Young is a 74 in 2k17 right now, and he's still dangerous in the right person's hands.ģ. We don't know how attributes work positionally so comparing them to Nick Young & Dwight Howard makes no sense. Especially since they're dynamic and will eventually even out to realistic numbers.Ģ. 2K always makes the top rookies around a 78-79. They look amazing tbh and I have no clue why you guys are complaining about ratings.ġ.